Turn a missed answer into a specific piece of work.
Open a buyer question, inspect who was named and which sources were cited, then review guidance generated from those collected answers. Decide what to change with the evidence in view.
Pro is in beta: join the waitlist and we’ll tell you when it opens. No payment is taken.
From one missed answer to a reviewable next step.
Illustrative exampleSelect a gap to inspect its evidence and suggested action.
Question-level guidance grounded in the answers collected.
Fictional example guidance. A completed action does not guarantee inclusion in a later answer.
Start with the observed gap
The guidance should point back to the answer and sources that prompted it. A missing explanation on your own site and a missing mention on an editorial page are different opportunities. Review the relevant evidence before deciding which work is worthwhile.
For a relevant change on your own site, the AI draft tools can prepare text from approved facts for review.
Treat the recommendation as a decision aid
A generated suggestion needs your judgement about accuracy, effort and relevance. The current feature does not create a budget-optimised plan, negotiate an inclusion or verify a published change. Its name describes the goal; it does not promise a named result.
For work across content, PR and development, a fractional AEO/GEO lead can coordinate the priorities and contributors within an agreed scope.
How it works
- Choose a question with collected answer data.
- Review the named brands, citations and generated guidance.
- Take the relevant work into the fixes and approvals board.
What to know before you use it
- Guidance is generated from the answers collected.
- It may miss context or recommend work that is unsuitable.
- This is not the unbuilt planner and does not guarantee mentions.
Questions
Will following the guidance make us appear?
No result is guaranteed. The guidance is based on observed samples and needs review.
Can I trace a suggestion back to the answer?
The page and explainer should expose the underlying question, response and cited-source evidence.
Coordinate the work behind the answer.
Get defined senior support to brief content, PR and technical contributors and review the available evidence.